Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Change Risk Anti-Patterns
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. v/r - TP 00:47, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Change Risk Anti-Patterns (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Previously nominated for speedy deletion as hoax/vandalism; that was rejected, and I have found further resources that indicate that if it is a hoax it is indeed quite an elaborate one! Hovever coverage seems to be limited to blog postings and the like, and WP:N appears not to be met. To complicate matters, the same subject seems to be also known as "Change Risk Analysis and Predictions". Is this notable or not? RichardOSmith (talk) 10:02, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 16:28, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 16:28, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete seems eligible under the "no content" rule. All it has is a link to itself. So be sure to also delete the CRAP (Computer Programming) redirect. Creator seems a single-purpose account: only edits in main space have been these two. W Nowicki (talk) 20:53, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.